As a Thought Experiment many years ago, I considered the following problem...
Pour a glass of ice tea. Put in a spoon and give it a swirl...how far do the molecules travel in the aggregate?
So...to determine this, I have many times tried to figure it out in my head. I have always felt (for over 25 years) that the molecules of water given a spin in this way travel many LIGHT YEARS, and I've had a few fun conversations about it, but have never actually figured it out until now...
(The density of water is roughly 1 g/cm3 or about 500 billion billion billion hydrogen atoms per cubic meter)
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 is the number of water molecules in 1 cup of water (500 cups in a cubic meter)
the distance each travels is 100 inches (33 rotations of 3 inches average (who cares, but this is like an 8 inch by 2 inch cylindrical glass full of water spinning 33 times!))
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 inches is how many light years?!?!? (if any!)
light year in inches:
180,000 miles/sec x 5280 ft/mile x 12 inches/ft x 60 seconds/minute x 60 minutes/hour x 24 hours/day x 365 days per year =
359,661,772,800,000,000 inches per light year.
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 inches / 359,661,772,800,000,000 inches per light year = BEAUCOUP LIGHT YEARS
278,039,000,979.97848716604001569332 light years.
Call it an even 250,000,000,000 light years in each coffee cup baby! Or maybe a lot less if you don't rotate it so much!!!
So each rotation causes the aggregate distance traveled by the molecules to be 1,000,000,000 light years!
The point of this story - molecules are really really tiny!
LOL hope your brain is bending around this, it is much easier written down, and I really appreciate my 11th grade Chemistry instructor Mrs. Usher (whom I found out later was a lesbian (while I was on an acid trip at my high school graduation ceremony the year after I graduated, don't ask what I was doing there, but I didn't have anything to do with the bomb that blew up during the ceremony!!! But, that's another story!)) for teaching me all about how to keep track of the units one is manipulating formulas, it has served me well.
My friend Fred has a weekly newsletter, that started this week with the following quotation...
"The gender police have already ruined college sports for many men, forcing the senseless elimination of 171 wrestling teams to reduce the overall proportion of men to women on college athletic teams. Fresh from that attack on masculinity, the new targets are math and science departments.
Somehow this is an "Attack on Masculinity"!!! Oh man, what will they think of next! Wrestlers, guys who dress in almost nothing and rub up against each other and make the other man submit (and I'm sure, in the distant past, submission was more than just slapping the floor!)...how very masculine!
Here are two disturbing quotes from the article, that is about chemicals and kids, and their unknown exposure and effects...
"A study led by Shanna Swan of the University of Rochester in New York shows that prenatal exposure to phthalates in males may be associated with impaired testicular function and with a defect that shortens the space between the genitals and anus."
(Sounds a little too convenient, eh?)
Sorry, please ignore/disregard/take personally/or otherwise be offended - (choose one) it isn't every day you find a quote like that!
If we can't even laugh, the breeders have won! (Oh that is really good, quote me Les!)
By the way, thanks to the alignment of the planets, GOOGLE Spelling doesn't know the word phthalates - the chemical in question, and the spell checker asked me if I really meant FATALITIES - oooh the humanity!
"[Rowan's] been on this planet for 18 months, and he's loaded with a chemical I've never heard of," Holland, 37, said. "He had two to three times the level of flame retardants in his body that's been known to cause thyroid dysfunction in lab rats."
(Gee dad, do you feel guilty for bringing life into this world of KNOWN RISKS, let alone these unknown ones...or are you just planning on suing some chemical/furniture factory.)
Does anyone else find it surprising/ASTONISHING that this type of research has NEVER been accomplished before?
Today in Southern California a series of wildfires either deliberately set, or caused by other "natural causes" (if, as one reporter proclaimed, a "downed power line" is a natural cause...)
(Very strong "Santa Ana" winds, a reverse weather phenomenom that causes adiabatically heated and dried air to be sent at hurricane speeds down canyons) are a huge contributor to the fires, and do cause power lines to fall as well!)
Republicans, such as Arnold and President Bush, are concerned about the people getting all that they need during the disaster.
"Emergency Management - Bring It On!"
(Sounds like socialism to me, like government roads, schools, MediCal, MediCare, Social Security, secure borders, etc.)
Once upon a time I wrote a disaster scenario to represent everything that could happen to a populace in one paragraph.
It was part of a software demonstration from Cliffside Software, a company my brother and I started (and finished!).
I'll replicate it herewith, after you read the real life scenario as it appeared today!
Here are a series of sentences that sum it up...weird stuff happens in a disaster...
-----------------------------------------------
A 1,049-inmate jail in Orange County was evacuated because of heavy smoke. The prisoners were bused to other lockups.
In San Diego County, where at least four fires burned, more than 200,000 reverse 911 calls — calls from county officials to residents — alerted residents to evacuations, said County Supervisor Roberts.
About 10,000 of them ended up at Qualcomm Stadium, home to the NFL's Chargers, where thousands of people huddled in eerie silence during the day Monday, staring at muted TV news reports of the wildfires. A lone concession stand served coffee and doughnuts. Many gathered in the
parking lot with their pets, which were banned from the stadium.
"The flames were like 100 feet high and it moved up the hill in seconds. It was at the bottom, it was in the middle, and then it was at the top," said Steve Jarrett, who helped a friend evacuate his home in nearby Escondido.
Fire near the San Diego Wild Animal Park led authorities to move condors, a cheetah, snakes and other animals to the fire-resistant veterinary hospital on the grounds of the park. The large animals, such as elephants, rhinos and antelope, were left in irrigated enclosures.
Flames forced the evacuation of the San Diego community of Ramona, which has a population of about 36,000.
As flames, thick smoke and choking ash filled the air around San Diego County's Lake Hodges, Stan Smith ignored orders to evacuate and stayed behind to help rescue the horses of his neighbor Ken Morris.
"It's hard to leave all your belongings and take off, and the bad thing is you can't get back in once you leave," Smith said. "I heard the cops come by, and I just ducked," Morris said.
Besides, said Smith, "Lots of time the fire doesn't ever come. It's come really close before. I've seen it so bad you couldn't even hear yourself talk over the flames and ash blowing everywhere."
---------------------------------------
I'll wager Smith has seen his share of "ash blowing everywhere"!
Here's what I wrote (circa 1996).
PlanAHEAD remains the world's only generalized contingency exercise development tool and is used to script training sessions to allow decision makers to learn how to overcome all of this and more:
Mutual Aid Pacts were activated by the time the torrential rain started and the tornado had just about roped out when the school bus stalled over the railroad tracks right next to the gasoline tank farm and the children's cries drowned out the noise of the flash flood, which washed away the cemetary, sending caskets into the river, threatening the dam and not playing havoc with the computer systems like the electro-magnetic pulse from the nuclear explosion which put a crimp in the power to the city, and the computer data network was badly affected by the sun spots, while the civil disturbance went into its second week with the nursing home hostages being released just one at a time, and only if they help save the health care workers from their plane's wreckage, which is still smoldering at the recently crowded stadium (now a temporary morgue), and the fuel which hadn't already burned is pouring into the storm drains, barely affecting the President and First Lady who made a surprise visit, so almost nobody noticed the earthquake, except those EOC members still trapped in the grain silo with the virus wielding band of bio-hazard terrorists.
The media, with live TV feeds just outside the EOC, blames your organization.
This is from a friend of mine who is displaced due to the fires as well.
Dear Michael,
We were evacuated yesterday from Lores Canyon and are presently staying in Newport Beach. Our home is at risk and right in the line of the fire, based on what we can see on television. We got out with a few pieces of clothing, our laptops, and about one precious item each--my mother's pearls, my son's baby blanket, my daughter's doll. I have 3 children with me: Kevin, my 13 year old; Caitlin, my 11 year old, and Sarah, my colleague Tony Sowch's daughter, who is 10. She was spending the night Saturday and by Sunday morning, the canyons had been closed, and us with NO electricity. We only found out about the fires because the electricity came on for 10 minutes and someone reached us by landline, since our mobile phones do not work up there. We came to Irvine to escape the fires, and then ended up at a friend's house that was evacuated last night, too. Needless to say, it has been a terribly traumatic 24+ hours and I do not even know where we are going tomorrow. We might need to take you up on your offer of a place to sleep, as we cannot stay forever in this hotel in Newport.
Glad they are safe and away from the smoke (I hope). I haven't left my condo and live in an apartment canyon, but the air seems awfully orange at the moment (from where I sit).
Yeah, the hose thingy is an classic TV photo op.
Valient home-owner vs. Mother Nature...
She's only has 100 foot tall non-native, invasive and water-table-robbing-Eucalyptus that burn off near the ground (thanks to the unmanaged "engineered-to-burn" chapparel), and become airborne when their leaves catch the fire generated plus Santa Ana wind turning into flaming arrows in the neighborhood.
Keep watching TV, you'll see some very likely!
Homeowner only has that little hose.
oh well...My uncle's house went down to the ground in a fire in 1963 I think - the LA Brentwood Fire, right up a canyon. His car was melted in the driveway and the chimney was still standing. They managed to salvage the silver service, it was melted into a glob, so they stuck it on a board and called it art.
Across the street, the house was untouched, except for a 2 inch burn hole about 6 foot up on one of the garage doors!
I'll go on the roof and take a peek later. We're in the middle of the city, if we get evacuated there is no where to go!
Good Luck, stay cool and don't be outside playing tennis or jogging...I know WAY too much about what is on that chapparel, I used to cruise through it for hours and hours as an archaeologist.
The smoke from a natural chapparel fire is plenty toxic.
The smoke from a current chapperel fire is doubly or trebly so, thanks to the smog that has been deposited upon the vegetation. Think of years of heavy soot hydrocarbons now coating the already waxy leaves of chapparel. They can tolerate that stuff great! But now, it is burning, so it is like YEARS of car exhaust all in one week...in your lungs.
Wonder why I don't have kids? I'd make a great dad...lol.
Enjoy your sister's kid(s) and don't have any, trust me, they, (your non-kids) will thank you!
When I was with IBM Rochester, (in Minnesota - 1983!) my parents came down from Minneapolis to visit (about 80 miles). They returned home just in front of a huge storm, and came back to our house 15 minutes later.
We ended up in a downstairs (basement split level, but up against the soil wall) bathroom as the tornadoes and hail and sleet and snow and torrential rain and shit went through town.
It was a mandatory evacuation. She is here too. He was on the roof earlier LOL. You called that!
-----Original Message-----
From: "Michael (Frish) Frishberg" <frish@gl.com>
To: "Ryan <r@reeee.com>
Sent: 10/22/07 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: Hi, how's the weather
Wholly shit batman.
What, did he dump your mother somewhere?
He's not on the roof with his hose? Hmmm
>
> Hey dads here..he just got mandatory evacuated. Its bad!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Michael (Frish) Frishberg" <frishberg@gmail.com>
> To: "To: "Ryan < r@reeee.com>
Subject: Hi, how's the weather
>
> I see Arnold on the TV sniffing smoke in San Diego...
>
> Are you downwind, upwind or winding down?!
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Frish
Ten Reasons to Impeach George Bush and Dick Cheney
Ask Congress to impeach President Bush and Vice President Cheney for (at least) the following reasons:
1. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.
2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.
3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.
4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.
5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.
6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.
7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.
8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.
9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.
10. Gross negligence in failing to assist New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina, in ignoring urgent warnings of an Al Qaeda attack prior to Sept. 11, 2001, and in increasing air pollution causing global warming.
I DON'T CLAIM TO HAVE WRITTEN THIS, I SIMPLY AGREE WITH IT...Frish
All kinds of claims are levied against candidates during the course of a campaign for president of America , but it'll be a frosty Friday before New Yorkers see one as ridiculous at that raised against Mayor Giuliani by Time magazine. A story by Amanda Ripley reports that "an analysis of 80 of Giuliani's major speeches from 1993 to 2001 shows that he mentioned the danger of terrorism only once." Well, backwards ran sentences until reeled the mind. Anyone who watched Mr. Giuliani through the period of his mayoralty remembers his vocal opposition of terrorism — so vocal, it was, that it was sometimes expressed at his own expense.
----------
The more I read about Amanda Ripley, the better I like her!
"Americans are broad-minded people. They'll accept the fact that a person can be an alcoholic, a dope fiend, a wife beater, and even a newspaperman, but if a man doesn't drive there's something wrong with him." - Art Buchwald
By MARTHA IRVINE and ROBERT TANNER, AP National Writers
The young teacher hung his head, avoiding eye contact. Yes, he had touched a fifth-grader's breast during recess. "I guess it was just lust of the flesh," he told his boss.
That got Gary C. Lindsey fired from his first teaching job in Oelwein, Iowa. But it didn't end his career. He taught for decades in Illinois and Iowa, fending off at least a half-dozen more abuse accusations.
When he finally surrendered his teaching license in 2004 — 40 years after that first little girl came forward — it wasn't a principal or a state agency that ended his career. It was one persistent victim and her parents.
Lindsey's case is just a small example of a widespread problem in American schools: sexual misconduct by the very teachers who are supposed to be nurturing the nation's children.
Students in America's schools are groped. They're raped. They're pursued, seduced and think they're in love.
An Associated Press investigation found more than 2,500 cases over five years in which educators were punished for actions from bizarre to sadistic.
There are 3 million public school teachers nationwide, most devoted to their work. Yet the number of abusive educators — nearly three for every school day — speaks to a much larger problem in a system that is stacked against victims.
Most of the abuse never gets reported. Those cases reported often end with no action. Cases investigated sometimes can't be proven, and many abusers have several victims.
And no one — not the schools, not the courts, not the state or federal governments — has found a surefire way to keep molesting teachers out of classrooms.
Those are the findings of an AP investigation in which reporters sought disciplinary records in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The result is an unprecedented national look at the scope of sex offenses by educators — the very definition of breach of trust.
The seven-month investigation found 2,570 educators whose teaching credentials were revoked, denied, surrendered or sanctioned from 2001 through 2005 following allegations of sexual misconduct.
Young people were the victims in at least 1,801 of the cases, and more than 80 percent of those were students. At least half the educators who were punished by their states also were convicted of crimes related to their misconduct.
The findings draw obvious comparisons to sex abuse scandals in other institutions, among them the Roman Catholic Church. A review by America's Catholic bishops found that about 4,400 of 110,000 priests were accused of molesting minors from 1950 through 2002.
Clergy abuse is part of the national consciousness after a string of highly publicized cases. But until now, there's been little sense of the extent of educator abuse.
Beyond the horror of individual crimes, the larger shame is that the institutions that govern education have only sporadically addressed a problem that's been apparent for years.
"From my own experience — this could get me in trouble — I think every single school district in the nation has at least one perpetrator. At least one," says Mary Jo McGrath, a California lawyer who has spent 30 years investigating abuse and misconduct in schools. "It doesn't matter if it's urban or rural or suburban."
One report mandated by Congress estimated that as many as 4.5 million students, out of roughly 50 million in American schools, are subject to sexual misconduct by an employee of a school sometime between kindergarten and 12th grade. That figure includes verbal harassment that's sexual in nature.
Jennah Bramow, one of Lindsey's accusers in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, wonders why there isn't more outrage.
"You're supposed to be able to send your kids to school knowing that they're going to be safe," says Bramow, now 20. While other victims accepted settlement deals and signed confidentiality agreements, she sued her city's schools for failing to protect her and others from Lindsey — and won. Only then was Lindsey's teaching license finally revoked.
As an 8-year-old elementary-school student, Bramow told how Lindsey forced her hand on what she called his "pee-pee."
"How did you know it was his pee-pee?" an interviewer at St. Luke's Child Protection Center in Cedar Rapids asked Jennah in a videotape, taken in 1995.
"'Cause I felt something?" said Jennah, then a fidgety girl with long, dark hair.
"How did it feel?" the investigator asked.
"Bumpy," Jennah replied. She drew a picture that showed how Lindsey made her touch him on the zipper area of his pants.
Lindsey, now 68, refused multiple requests for an interview. "It never occurs to you people that some people don't want their past opened back up," he said when an AP reporter approached him at his home outside Cedar Rapids and asked questions.
That past, according to evidence presented in the Bramow's civil case, included accusations from students and parents along with reprimands from principals that were filed away, explained away and ultimately ignored until 1995, when accusations from Bramow and two other girls forced his early retirement. Even then, he kept his teaching license until the Bramows took the case public and filed a complaint with the state.
Like Lindsey, the perpetrators that the AP found are everyday educators — teachers, school psychologists, principals and superintendents among them. They're often popular and recognized for excellence and, in nearly nine out of 10 cases, they're male. While some abused students in school, others were cited for sexual misconduct after hours that didn't necessarily involve a kid from their classes, such as viewing or distributing child pornography.
They include:
• Joseph E. Hayes, a former principal in East St. Louis, Ill. DNA evidence in a civil case determined that he impregnated a 14-year-old student. Never charged criminally, his license was suspended in 2003. He has ignored an order to surrender it permanently.
• Donald M. Landrum, a high school teacher in Polk County, N.C. His bosses warned him not to meet with female students behind closed doors. They put a glass window in his office door, but Landrum papered over it. Police later found pornography and condoms in his office and alleged that he was about to have sex with a female student. His license was revoked in 2005.
• Rebecca A. Boicelli, a former teacher in Redwood City, Calif. She conceived a child with a 16-year-old former student then went on maternity leave in 2004 while police investigated. She was hired to teach in a nearby school district; board members said police hadn't told them about the investigation.
The overwhelming majority of cases the AP examined involved teachers in public schools. Private school teachers rarely turn up because many are not required to have a teaching license and, even when they have one, disciplinary actions are typically handled within the school.
Two of the nation's major teachers unions, the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, each denounced sex abuse while emphasizing that educators' rights also must be taken into account.
"Students must be protected from sexual predators and abuse, and teachers must be protected from false accusations," said NEA President Reg Weaver, who refused to be interviewed and instead released a two-paragraph statement.
Kathy Buzad of the AFT said that "if there's one incident of sexual misconduct between a teacher and a student that's one too many."
The United States has grown more sympathetic to victims of sex abuse over recent decades, particularly when it comes to young people. Laws that protect children from abusers bear the names of young victims. Police have made pursuing Internet predators a priority. People convicted of abuse typically face tough sentences and registry as sex offenders.
Even so, sexually abusive teachers continue to take advantage, and there are several reasons why.
For one, many Americans deny the problem, and even treat the abuse with misplaced fascination. Popular media reports trumpet relationships between attractive female teachers and male students.
"It's dealt with in a salacious manner with late-night comedians saying 'What 14-year-old boy wouldn't want to have sex with his teacher?' It trivializes the whole issue," says Robert Shoop, a professor of educational administration at Kansas State University who has written a book aimed at helping school districts identify and deal with sexual misconduct.
"In other cases, it's reported as if this is some deviant who crawled into the school district — 'and now that they're gone, everything's OK.' But it's much more prevalent than people would think."
The AP investigation found efforts to stop individual offenders but, overall, a deeply entrenched resistance toward recognizing and fighting abuse. It starts in school hallways, where fellow teachers look away or feel powerless to help. School administrators make behind-the-scenes deals to avoid lawsuits and other trouble. And in state capitals and Congress, lawmakers shy from tough state punishments or any cohesive national policy for fear of disparaging a vital profession.
That only enables rogue teachers, and puts kids who aren't likely to be believed in a tough spot.
In case after case the AP examined, accusations of inappropriate behavior were dismissed. One girl in Mansfield, Ohio , complained about a sexual assault by teacher Donald Coots and got expelled. It was only when a second girl, years later, brought a similar complaint against the same teacher that he was punished.
And that second girl also was ostracized by the school community and ultimately left town.
Unless there's a videotape of a teacher involved with a child, everyone wants to believe the authority figure, says Wayne Promisel, a retired Virginia detective who has investigated many sex abuse cases.
He and others who track the problem reiterated one point repeatedly during the AP investigation: Very few abusers get caught.
They point to several academic studies estimating that only about one in 10 victimized children report sexual abuse of any kind to someone who can do something about it.
Teachers, administrators and even parents frequently don't, or won't, recognize the signs that a crime is taking place.
"They can't see what's in front of their face. Not unlike a kid in an alcoholic family, who'll say 'My family is great,'" says McGrath, the California lawyer and investigator who now trains entire school systems how to recognize what she calls the unmistakable "red flags" of misconduct.
In Hamburg, Pa., in 2002, those "red flags" should have been clear. A student skipped classes every day to spend time with one teacher. He gave her gifts and rides in his car. She sat on his lap. The bond ran so deep that the student got chastised repeatedly — even suspended once for being late and absent so often. But there were no questions for the teacher.
Heather Kline was 12, a girl with a broad smile and blond hair pulled back tight. Teacher Troy Mansfield had cultivated her since she was in his third-grade class.
"Kids, like, idolized me because they thought I was, like, cool because he paid more attention to me," says Kline, now 18, sitting at her mother's kitchen table, sorting through a file of old poems and cards from Mansfield. "I was just like really comfortable. I could tell him anything."
He never pushed her, just raised the stakes, bit by bit — a comment about how good she looked, a gift, a hug.
She was sure she was in love.
By winter of seventh grade, he was sneaking her off in his car for an hour of sex, dropping in on her weekly baby-sitting duties, e-mailing about what clothes she should wear, about his sexual fantasies, about marriage and children.
Mansfield finally got caught by the girl's mother, and his own words convicted him. At his criminal trial in 2004, Heather read his e-mails and instant messages aloud, from declarations of true love to explicit references to past sex. He's serving up to 31 years in state prison.
The growing use of e-mails and text messages is leaving a trail that investigators and prosecutors can use to prove an intimate relationship when other evidence is hard to find.
Even then, many in the community find it difficult to accept that a predator is in their midst. When these cases break, defendants often portray the students as seducers or false accusers. However, every investigator questioned said that is largely a misconception.
"I've been involved in several hundred investigations," says Martin Bates, an assistant superintendent in a Salt Lake City school district. "I think I've seen that just a couple of times ... where a teacher is being pursued by a student."
Too often, problem teachers are allowed to leave quietly. That can mean future abuse for another student and another school district.
"They might deal with it internally, suspending the person or having the person move on. So their license is never investigated," says Charol Shakeshaft, a leading expert in teacher sex abuse who heads the educational leadership department at Virginia Commonwealth University.
It's a dynamic so common it has its own nicknames — "passing the trash" or the "mobile molester."
Laws in several states require that even an allegation of sexual misconduct be reported to the state departments that oversee teacher licenses. But there's no consistent enforcement, so such laws are easy to ignore.
School officials fear public embarrassment as much as the perpetrators do, Shakeshaft says. They want to avoid the fallout from going up against a popular teacher. They also don't want to get sued by teachers or victims, and they don't want to face a challenge from a strong union.
In the Iowa case, Lindsey agreed to leave without fighting when his bosses kept the reason for his departure confidential. The decades' worth of allegations against him would have stayed secret, if not for Bramow.
Across the country, such deals and lack of information-sharing allow abusive teachers to jump state lines, even when one school does put a stop to the abuse.
While some schools and states have been aggressive about investigating problem teachers and publicizing it when they're found, others were hesitant to share details of cases with the AP — Alabama and Mississippi among the more resistant. Maine, the only state that gave the AP no disciplinary information, has a law that keeps offending teachers' cases secret.
Meanwhile, the reasons given for punishing hundreds of educators, including many in California, were so vague there was no way to tell why they'd been punished, until further investigation by AP reporters revealed it was sexual misconduct.
And in Hawaii, no educators were disciplined by the state in the five years the AP examined, even though some teachers there were serving sentences for various sex crimes during that time. They technically remained teachers, even behind bars.
Elsewhere, there have been fitful steps toward catching errant teachers that may be having some effect. The AP found the number of state actions against sexually abusive teachers rose steadily, to a high of 649 in 2005.
More states now require background checks on teachers, fingerprinting and mandatory reporting of abuse, though there are still loopholes and a lack of coordination among districts and states.
U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the last 20 years on civil rights and sex discrimination have opened schools up to potentially huge financial punishments for abuses, which has driven some schools to act.
And the National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification keeps a list of educators who've been punished for any reason, but only shares the names among state agencies.
The uncoordinated system that's developed means some teachers still fall through the cracks. Aaron M. Brevik is a case in point.
Brevik was a teacher at an elementary school in Warren, Mich., until he was accused of using a camera hidden in a gym bag to secretly film boys in locker rooms and showers. He also faced charges that he recorded himself molesting a boy while the child slept.
Found guilty of criminal sexual conduct, Brevik is now serving a five- to 20-year prison sentence and lost his Michigan license in 2005.
What Michigan officials apparently didn't know when they hired him was that Brevik's teaching license in Minnesota had been permanently suspended in 2001 after he allegedly invited two male minors to stay with him in a hotel room. He was principal of an elementary school in southeastern Minnesota at the time.
"I tell you what, they never go away. They just blend a little better," says Steve Janosko, a prosecutor in Ocean County, N.J., who handled the case of a former high school teacher and football coach, Nicholas J. Arminio.
Arminio surrendered his New Jersey teaching license in 1994 after two female students separately accused him of inappropriate touching. The state of Maryland didn't know that when he applied for teaching credentials and took a job at a high school in Baltimore County. He eventually resigned and lost that license, too.
Even so, until this month, he was coaching football at another Baltimore County high school in a job that does not require a teaching license. After the AP started asking questions, he was fired.
Victims also face consequences when teachers are punished.
In Pennsylvania, after news of teacher Troy Mansfield's arrest hit, girls called Kline, his 12-year-old victim, a "slut" to her face. A teacher called her a "vixen." Friends stopped talking to her. Kids no longer sat with her at lunch.
Her abuser, meanwhile, had been a popular teacher and football coach.
So, between rumors that she was pregnant or doing drugs and her own panic attacks and depression, Kline bounced between schools. At 16, she ran away to Nashville.
"I didn't have my childhood," says Kline, who's back home now, working at a grocery cash register and hoping to get her GED so she can go to nursing school. "He had me so matured at so young.
"I remember going from little baby dolls to just being an adult."
The courts dealt her a final insult. A federal judge dismissed her civil suit against the school, saying administrators had no obligation to protect her from a predatory teacher since officials were unaware of the abuse, despite what the court called widespread "unsubstantiated rumors" in the school. The family is appealing.
In Iowa, the state Supreme Court made the opposite ruling in the Bramow case, deciding she and her parents could sue the Cedar Rapids schools for failing to stop Lindsey.
Bramow, now a young mother who waits tables for a living, won a $20,000 judgment. But Lindsey was never criminally charged due to what the former county prosecutor deemed insufficient evidence.
Arthur Sensor, the former superintendent in Oelwein, Iowa, who vividly recalls pressuring Lindsey to quit on Feb. 18, 1964, regrets that he didn't do more to stop him back then.
Now, he says, he'd call the police.
"He promised me he wouldn't do it again — that he had learned. And he was a young man, a beginning teacher, had a young wife, a young child," Sensor, now 86 years old, said during testimony at the Bramows' civil trial.
I am even more vehement then the next person about the immorality of any decision that includes bringing another human life onto the planet.
I just don't "get it" when it comes to the "morality of veganism"!
...snip...(I had a whole lot of other stuff here about how there is no difference between plant and animal protein, morally, since the far greater problem was that WE (humanity) are still eating, altogether!
And, while I am correct, it is, as the subject line states "off topic"!)
Anyway, vegans, thanks!
You've elicited one original thought from me tonight!!!
Upon some serious self reflection, I conclude that here is something we can all agree upon:
I am just another reason VHE must be accomplished!
It was a pick up game, seven innings, late in the school year and I was pitching.
I only played pitcher or catcher, since I didn't run well and couldn't throw very far, as I never learned how! I casually picked off batters, three up and three down 5 innings in a row. The opponents called it a night, it was obvious they weren't going to hit me.
She was up in the stands, blonde and stacked and pretty cute. I knew who she was; she had just dumped my friend Cornie. I didn't pay much attention to his love life, they had been going out for a couple of years, but when he wasn't out with her he was partying with us.
What I found out later was that she had her girl friend drive her way out to the ball park we were using, just to meet me. I was somewhat clueless and somewhat sophisticated, a wonderful and normal combination for a 16 year old.
Cornie was a sensitive guy, and was also real broken up by this twat. Ah well. I actually think that Cornie was gay, but in the closet at that point, haven't seen him in over 30 years. I don't know what became of him.
Anyway, after the game she sauntered over to me and said hello.
I noticed her bodacious tata's.
It was obvious that just looking at me made her pee a little puddle, but I ignored her advances judiciously. Coy works a lot better than obvious, I had that part mastered already.
She gave me her number and, while I wasn't even that interested, I gave her a call, since I was in between girls that week.
My "standard" date was pretty awesome, to most girls, and usually got me what I wanted.
There was a pretty decent chinese place downtown called Fu King's Palace. All my girls had enjoyed that place, then I would take them back to the theatre near my house, where they had been showing Harold and Maude for three years running. My favorite movie, which was lucky, since I'd seen it 22 times with different dates already, somehow it got them in the mood, being a love story and all.
Afterwards, depending on the season, we'd enjoy each other's company in the back of a car, skinny dipping in a lake, lying out on my pool table in the basement (with my parents watching tv upstairs) or, if her parents weren't around, off to her house.
But, this date was different.
I picked her up on time and told her where we were going for dinner. She turned to me and said "Fuck NO!" since she had worked at the Palace for two years during summers and was sick as hell of the food there.
This almost derailed me.
Turned out she wasn't that interested in small talk and dinner anyway, and had already seen Harold and Maude and didn't want to see it again.
Where we ate, I can't recall, but the back of my car afterwards was an adventure I've never forgotten, over three decades years later!
The following week Cornie was present at the Winto's Friday get together at Cageman's house.
I think all the Wintos were there, the core group of Schultz, Cageman, Walleye, Richey, Turncoat and me, Cornie and Bennie, even Pollack and Burns, peripheral members got together with us when they could.
I tried to be casual with Cornie, since I knew he was sensitive, but he had already heard (from one of her bitch girlfriends) that his ex and I had gone out.
Well, it wasn't two minutes into my visit there that he began to chew my ass and the "what happened on the date" bullshit started. I was extremely reluctant to tell him, since I don't kiss and tell, but he was more than insistent.
What a fuckin' plonker. I hit the bong again and again, hoping to pass out instead of being abused by his confrontation. But Cornie didn't let up a minute. It was silly and not fun but I held my ground.
My defenses lowered slowly, the vodka and beer and pot took its toll, but still I held out. Finally after about two hours of his constant harassment, I told him what he didn't want to hear. He said he didn't believe me. I said I could prove it.
The rest of the Winto gang were pissed at Cornie, and at me for what they perceived as my teasing, yet they were also unnaturally interested in how I could prove it!
I kept my mouth shut again, but Cornie wouldn't let up. . . "Well prove it then, motherfucker!"
I tried hard, since I didn't want to hurt him, but, worn down and bored, and actually a little pissed at his insistence, I finally whispered the proof into his ear. I figured if she could tell her girlfriends about me, I could tell her Ex about what we'd done too.
That was not exactly brilliant, but nothing else was going to shut Cornie up!
His reaction was a good imitation of cardiac arrest. He turned white, then a brilliant shade of red. He ran right through a door, into Cageman's bedroom and dove onto the bed for the phone.
He almost broke a finger calling her, to discuss the facts, now that he knew that I could prove it.
The rest of the Gang were laughing at this point, and I was simply sad. "What did you tell him man? Why did he dive for the phone like that? What the fug was the "proof" you offered anyway?" were just a few of the questions I was reluctant to answer.
Finally, hearing the sobs from the bedroom as Cornie cried his guts out, I broke down and told them. I knew that the consequences would not be good for my future with that particular pussy, but I couldn't keep my mouth shut for some reason, just had to share.
Knowing what I said next would only get them to ask a whole bunch more questions, I blurted it out anyway..."She has Inverted Nipples dudes!"
She got me back a couple weeks later. That's a whole 'nuther story.
(KDKA)PITTSBURGH A Pittsburgh man is in the Allegheny County Jail on $100,000 straight bond for allegedly yelling at a police dog.
Kenneth King, 23, walked by a K-9 police cruiser at a Sunoco station on the North Side shortly after midnight on Saturday and was startled by the dog, which was barking.
Police say King yelled at the dog, "Shut the [expletive] up, and charged with taunting a police animal.
King's parents call it absurd.
"To officially charge him with yelling at a dog – that's asinine to me," Annette Cash, his mother, said.
But at King's arraignment, District Justice Gene Ricciardi put him in jail and set the bond.
"A police dog is a police officer. There is no difference under the law," Ricciardi tells KDKA. "They are not pets and they are trained in the purposes of law enforcement and anyone who would taunt a police officer can be considered a threat to the community."
King's parents say their son, who was returning home from his job as a cook, has no criminal history and poses no threat to anyone.
According to the police report, King placed his hand on his back pocket and threatened to "shank" the dog. After police arrested him and patted him down, they discovered King was carrying a knife.
From jail, King told his parents he did say he would shank the dog but muttered it under his breath and didn't direct it at the officers and that he had no intent of harming the dog.
"Our son was wrong and he acknowledges he was wrong and we don't sit here and say he was right," Keith Cash, his father, said.
His parent say they have no way of coming up with his bond, so their son will stay in jail at least until next week when he faces a preliminary hearing. In the meantime, they say he stands to lose both of his jobs.
Police: Suspect flew into rage when clerk in Pa. refused bogus currency
Updated: 6:10 a.m. PT Oct 9, 2007
PITTSBURGH - Change for a million?
That's what a man was seeking Saturday when he handed a $1 million bill to a cashier at a Pittsburgh supermarket. But when the Giant Eagle employee refused and a manager confiscated the bogus bill, the man flew into a rage, police said.
The man slammed an electronic funds-transfer machine into the counter and reached for a scanner gun, police said.
Police arrested the man, who was not carrying identification and has refused to give his name to authorities. He is being held in the Allegheny County Jail.
Since 1969, the $100 bill is the largest note in circulation.
Police believe the $1 million note seized at the supermarket may have originated at a Dallas-based ministry. Last year, the ministry distributed thousands of religious pamphlets with a picture of President Grover Cleveland on a $1 million bill.
Hey, I know the Subject: of the post had nothing to do with the post, just practicing taking Karl Rove's position next year in the White House!!! (Frish)
Fred - you quote S. Fred Singer? Debunked all over the place since 1997 and before! The title of his presentation says it all - Global Warming - Man Made or Natural! He doesn't dispute that change is happening, just that humans aren't responsible somehow. Which flies in the face of all scientific evidence, but hey, why should he worry about that?!?
Being a contrarian, he ought to know a little something about making money during global climate change. He gets paid big bucks to buck the trend, (Not a trend exactly, simply total consensus by every major scientific body, NASA, the US Military (Pentagon Report on Security Threats due To Global Warming) and by every major government in the world and a lot of minor ones too (cities and states and etc. that human activities are affecting climate change!).
Fred, c'mon, what kind of conspiracy theory is that, when there is consensus world wide that climate change due to human action is true and happening...could all those scientists and governments be in on something nefarious??? Why?
Do you even wonder why F. Fred Singer is the only guy you can quote? No one else in the climatological field agrees with him. What makes him so smart? LOL
Get real, follow the real money. He thinks that Greenpeace somehow benefits from global warming scares? With "billions" (not likely) of dollars?
Do you think that global OIL doesn't benefit to the TRILLIONS of dollars by keeping the status quo?
Greenpeace didn't cause all the governments in the world to "capitulate" to some phony theory! How real is that Fred, C'mon!
Science my friend, that is the key. Not arm waving, rhetoric filled crap from S. Fred Singer, who cherry picks what he says to you...For example, sure, a "slight" increase in CO2 might have beneficial effects.
Did he fail to mention that the CURRENT LEVEL OF CO2 IS HIGHER THAN IT HAS BEEN IN 500,000 YEARS OR MORE?
Fred, you turn on your stove and put a kettle of water to boil.
The burners are on really hot for a long time before the water boils, no?
Same thing with the Earth's atmosphere and biosphere. The CO2 is like the burner, and it has been turned WAY WAY UP! No one disputes this, see any "hockey stick" diagram.
Think about how water boils in the pan. There are chaotic currents set up, and eventually a bubble of steam forms at some imperfection in the bottom of the pan. That sets up an entirely different set of currents, and more chaos ensues, until boiling occurs...
Now, the items being heated are the atmosphere and the oceans. The evidence is the thinnest and smallest polar ice cap ever, for example. And, just like in the pan, not everything is nice and even. Some years are warmer or dryer or cooler, it is a chaotic response to the CO2 input into the system. However, the warming is insidious and continues, all the time, AND WE CONTINUE TO INCREASE OUR OUTPUT OF CO2, THUS INCREASING THE MOMENTUM OF CHANGE, LIKE WE'RE TURNING UP THE STOVE!
Fred, if we wait to try to fix things after the water is boiling, it will be way way way too late. (In the reality in which I live, that we only partially share it seems, it is already too late Fred, the momentum of warming is already beyond our capability to change, and it will lead to a greatly diminished human carrying capacity in the biosphere (in other words, great numbers of humans will die due to the heat waves, flooding, ice melting, forest fires, and other climate catastrophes that will be ever increasing. It may already be too late, the balance of the climatic equilibrium may already be so far off kilter that as the pendulum swings it will simply wipe humanity off the planet...as it rebounds like a ringing bell from man's intervention.)
Can't imagine why you choose not to believe this, it is not only rational it is real.
The true irony is that S. Fred Singer's mis-information simply increases the probability that the deleterious effects of human climate disruption will be far more serious than otherwise.
Fred, I don't have kids, so in truth, I don't care that much...too bad you can't see through whatever fog-lensed glasses you choose to wear.
The Global Warming Scare
"We asked the important question of whether there is appreciable man-made warming today. We presented evidence that indicates there is not, thereby suggesting that attempts by governments to control greenhouse-gas emissions are pointless and unwise. Nevertheless. we have state governors calling for CO2 emissions limits on cars; we have city mayors calling for mandatory CO2 controls; we have the Supreme Court declaring CO2 a pollutant that may have to be regulated; we have every industrialized nation (with the exception of the U.S. and Australia) signed on to the Kyoto Protocol; and we have ongoing international demands for even more stringent controls when Kyoto expires in 2012. What's going on here? [. . .]
"It is [. . .] worth noting that tens of thousands of interested persons benefit directly from the global warming scare -- at the expense of the ordinary consumer. Environmental organizations globally, such as Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, and the Environmental Defense Fund, have raked in billions of dollars. Multi-billion-dollar government subsidies for useless mitigation schemes are large and growing. Emission trading programs will soon reach the $100 billion a year level, with large fees paid to brokers and those who operate the scams. In other words, many people have discovered they can benefit from climate scares and have formed an entrenched interest. [. . .]
"The irony is that a slightly warmer climate with more carbon dioxide is in many ways beneficial rather than damaging. Economic studies have demonstrated that a modest warming and higher CO2 levels will increase GNP and raise standards of living, primarily by improving agriculture and forestry. It's a well-known fact that CO2 is plant food and essential to the growth of crops and trees -- and ultimately to the well-being of animals and humans." -- "Global Warming: Man-Made or Natural?" by S. Fred Singer, Imprimis, the National Speech Digest of Hillsdale College, August 2007, pages 4-5. Subscription free upon request. Address: Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242. Phone: 800-437-2268.
The article is interesting, and, while almost impossible to verify, it probably is also correct. However, I'd be reluctant to attribute much "progress", as our human nature actually is unchanged. Michael Vick plead guilty to torturing and electrocuting dogs just a few weeks ago, what's changed again???
>A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE >by Steven Pinker > >In sixteenth-century Paris, a popular form of entertainment was >cat-burning, in which a cat was hoisted in a sling on a stage and slowly >lowered into a fire. According to historian Norman Davies, "[T]he >spectators, including kings and queens, shrieked with laughter as the >animals, howling with pain, were singed, roasted, and finally >carbonized." Today, such sadism would be unthinkable in most of the >world. This change in sensibilities is just one example of perhaps the >most important and most underappreciated trend in the human saga: >Violence has been in decline over long stretches of history, and today >we are probably living in the most peaceful moment of our species' time >on earth.
The decline in violence corresponds to lots of things...including unprecedented availability of previously scarse resources, like food!, and the rise of the Nation State, public education (so your dad didn't just beat you into working the farm for example), etc. etc. etc. Our lives, in general, are far less harsh than lives lived 300 years ago...and most of us are reluctant to rock any boats!
Political power is administered by force or threat of force... The last successful people's revolution, where the people had equal fire power to the government, was the French Revolution!
So, what the author declines to mention, is that we're now living in a situation that is generally Ruled By Law. The local bandit/bully cannot terrorize the neighborhood, or police are called...
That wasn't true way back when. And, what passes for "entertainment" today would probably astound/digust those in the 1500's as much as roasting cats astounds/disgusts us today.
The definition (according to Milton Berle, I believe) of Humor is when something bad happens (to somebody else!). That hasn't changed either.
Cultural changes cannot be "managed", however much Dr. Dobson yearns for some supposedly "better" tradition. Families are far more diverse than ever before, and our economy and society seem to be coping.
His single issue vehemence only serves to isolate him, and his support for a third party candidate would seal the deal. That's why Giuliani doesn't care about Dr. Dobson, he knows he'll get those votes anyway...
To further educate Dr. Dobson, there are those who feel that having children is immoral altogether, but that is a different discussion.
I hope any political activities including fundraising and "calls-to-action" via sermon by churches are taxed appropriately.
Frish
(Apologies to VHEMTers (I mean, "single issue vehemence", I couldn't resist!!))
Charges dropped in sherry enema death case Wed Oct 3, 6:00 PM ET HOUSTON (Reuters) - Charges have been dropped against a Texas woman who was accused of giving her husband a sherry enema that killed him.
Tammy Jean Warner had been indicted for negligent homicide in the May 2004 death of Michael Warner, 58, but the Brazoria County District Attorney's office said on Wednesday the charge was dropped a month ago for lack of evidence.
The Houston Chronicle said Warner, 45, had been scheduled to go to court next week for a trial that had been reset six times.
At the time of Warner's indictment in 2005, police told the Chronicle the woman had given her husband two large bottles of sherry, which raised his blood alcohol level to 0.47 percent, or nearly six times the level considered legally drunk in Texas.
Warner admitted administering the enema but denied she caused the death of her husband, who was a machine shop operator. The incident occurred at their home in Lake Jackson, near Houston.
She told the newspaper her husband was addicted to enemas and often used alcohol in that manner. Police said Warner had a throat ailment that left him unable to drink the sherry.
Fri Sep 28, 1:42 PM ET BERLIN (Reuters) - A German factory worker stole over a million screws from his employer and skewed the market with his cheap stolen goods, police said Friday.
"In the end, it became obvious that screws were being sold for much less than they usually cost," said a spokesman for police in the southern city of Wuerzburg.
Over two years, the 33-year-old assembly plant worker smuggled between 2,000 and 7,000 screws out of work each night, and auctioned them on an Internet site, police said. The scheme cost his firm around 110,000 euros ($156,000).
Okay, so we agree there should be no more of us. If this doesn't motivate you to get snipped or tied, there is nothing more I can say! (It is actually very clever, even if the topic/theme is something I've luckily never had to experience!)
"Forgive my indignation if this message comes to you as a surprise and may offend your personality for contacting you without your prior consent and writing through this unofficial channel."
His Indignation? His "imposition" or something, but indignation? LOL
WHAT CAUGHT MY EYE ABOUT THIS ARTICLE IS THAT MY FRIEND MARK AND I USED TO PLAY IN THE VERY PLACE THESE ROAD KILL HAD BEEN DEPOSITED!
WE USED TO RIDE OUR 10 SPEED SCHWINNS UP HWY 9 TO A GRAVEL QUARRY, AND "SKI" DOWN THE GRAVEL SLOPE NARROWLY AVOIDING GETTING BURIED BY THE SLIDING DIRT...
I WAS 10 - 12 AT THE TIME. THE COASTAL MOUNTAINS IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ARE QUITE IMPRESSIVE, BEAUTIFUL PINES AND REDWOODS...
I LOVE how the Republican senator is quoted as saying Kyoto is a failure, when the US never signed it. How could Kyoto be anything but a failure when the world's biggest CO2 contributor ignores it entirely!
Ah, but that's not the half of it. You see, there are poor people in the world, a lot of them, and, while the climate might get worse someday, right now those hungry poor people are commanding our political attention...they want electricity for example, and computers for their kids...etc.
The best part of course is competing committees of countries trying to agree to something and simply talking a lot. None of them truly understand how our activities have ALREADY set off a chain of unstoppable events in the atmosphere, with unintended and un-productive results.
The arctic pack ice was lowest ever recently, very very bad from a climate change perspective...open water is almost black, absorbing all of the sun's rays, whereas the sea ice was WHITE basically reflecting the solar radiation...big time difference...
By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 26, 4:36 PM ET
WASHINGTON - A day before President Bush's climate talks, China and other developing nations said Wednesday the need to provide food, shelter and clothes for their citizens must come ahead of global warming concerns.
"For a developing country, the main task is to reduce poverty," Xie Zhenhua, vice chairman of China's national development and reform commission, told a forum sponsored by the Center for Clean Air Policy, a think tank.
Mexico's environment minister agreed. "We have always to bear in mind that half our population is at the poverty line," said Juan Rafael Elvira Quesada. "We are also extremely concerned about the consequences, the adverse affects of climate change."
They expressed a strong preference for the climate negotiations later this year sponsored by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, instead of Bush's meeting Thursday and Friday for 16 "major emitter" countries, including China and India.
"All these discussions should be taken within the framework of the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol," Xie said.
The 175-nation Kyoto pact rejected by Bush requires industrial nations to reduce carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases and set an average target of a 5 percent cut below 1990 emissions levels by 2012. A U.N. climate summit Monday in New York sought to inject momentum behind December's annual climate treaty conference in Bali, Indonesia, for discussing what will succeed the Kyoto climate pact that expires in 2012.
Sergio Serra, Brazil's first ambassador in charge of global warming issues, said the United States must realize that developing countries are trying to curb their emissions while also lifting the welfare of their citizens.
"It is a myth to think the developing countries are doing nothing to address climate change," he said.
As for the U.S.-sponsored talks later this week, he said, "We saw this as ... a very positive sign that this country is resuming the leadership that it always should have had."
Portuguese environment minister Humberto Rosa, whose country currently holds the European Union presidency, said it would be unfair to expect developing nations to adopt firm targets for cutting carbon emissions, the way the biggest industrialized polluters should.
"We want developing nations to do their share. This is not a moment in time for them to have such targets," he said. "We don't depart from the same situation; we do not have the same responsibilities."
On Monday, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described the U.N. negotiating process as "the only forum" where the issues can be decided. Before 80 world leaders, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called for "action, action, action."
At a House hearing Wednesday, three U.N. envoys on climate change and the German environment minister urged U.S. lawmakers to commit to binding caps on emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Many of the visiting officials have sought to blunt an argument made by the White House and some congressional allies that mandatory caps would harm the U.S. economy. The visiting officials have been arguing that new markets in carbon trading and in technology to reduce emissions are economic opportunities. They say that improving energy efficiency will improve economic efficiency.
"The European Union is convinced that our climate protection efforts provide great opportunities and the transformation to a low carbon economy will enhance our competitiveness," Germany's environment minister, Signmar Gabriel told the panel.
But lingering opposition to mandatory caps was evident at the hearing.
"A decade after Kyoto, it is clear to me that the treaty produced far too few results. It is a failure," Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., told the officials.
The chairman of the panel, Democratic Rep. Edward Markey, said that the visitors have a difficult case to make in persuading the White House of the need for mandatory caps.
"The world has been asked to Washington to discuss this issue this week," said Markey, D-Mass. "But it is a little bit like being invited to a prayer breakfast with a group of fellow believers, but the meeting is hosted by an atheist."
___
Associated Press Writer Desmond Butler contributed to this report
I have a radio announcer voice (see first post in this blog!). It does seem to help me "get over" if you know what I mean. No one has ever complained about the timbre or pitch of my voice, although I tend to whine...
Man's voice an indicator of sexual potency: Canadian Research; Men with deep tones produce more children
If a recent study holds true, having a voice like the late Barry White, (oh, baby), can be the key to sexual potency.
Tom Blackwell, National PostPublished: Tuesday, September 25, 2007
For many women, the deepness of a man's voice is one of the most powerful aphrodisiacs, a new study co-authored by a Canadian psychologist suggests.
All else being equal, males with lower voices produce more children than their higher-pitched counterparts, concluded the researchers in a search for evolutionary explanations of sexual attraction.
The study looked at Tanzania's Hadza tribesmen, one of the world's few remaining hunter-gatherer societies, because the Hadzas never use birth control, a complicating factor that makes it impossible to do such research elsewhere in the world.
The discovery that the pitch of their voices was a major determinant of how many children they would father underlines the deep-seated roots of the seemingly superficial human trait, said David Feinberg, a psychology professor at Mc-Master University in Hamilton, Ont.
Previous research has indicated that a deep voice signifies robust genes, in evolutionary terms.
The findings, however, can not really be put into action on the dating scene, stressed Prof. Feinberg, a co-author of the study.
"This doesn't mean, go out and find a guy with a low-pitched voice if you want to have lots of babies," he said. "[But] it tells us a bit about where we came from and where we're going." The findings, though, came as no surprise yesterday to professionals in the dating world.
At Toronto-based Misty River Introductions, billed as a "traditional match-maker," men with deep voices always seem to do better, and are much more likely to move beyond the initial stage of a telephone conversation with their potential date, said manager Linda Miller.
"We've had certain clients, you couldn't tell if they were men or women when they called in. They don't do terribly well," she said. "And then you have men who have radio-annnouncer voices, they have that great masculine timbre, and every call is a hit."
Some of Ruth Claramunt's female clients at Hearts Canada, another match-making service, have actually specified that they like men with low voices.
"Or if someone has a squeaky little voice: 'Oh, I didn't really like him,' " said Ms. Claramunt.
"They could be a great big hunky guy and if they have a squeaky voice over the phone, it's sort of a negative."
Prof. Feinberg said he has been trying to see whether human males attract their mates with the same kind of "ornaments," like a peacock's plumage or a deer's antlers, seen elsewhere in the animal world.
Earlier in human evolution, it appears that the appeal of a deep voice was linked to testosterone levels. Deep voices are caused by high testosterone levels in adolescent. Large volumes of the hormone can also prompt immune suppression in a weaker person, so someone who survived to manhood with a deep voice would necessarily have a strong genetic makeup, said the psychologist.
No one, however, has been able to test until now whether the attraction of a deep male voice translated into their having more reproductive success.
For the study, Prof. Feinberg and his colleagues, anthropologists at Harvard and Florida State Universities, looked at 49 men and 42 women among the 1,000-strong Hadza people, who choose their own mates but have a fairly high divorce rate in an informal system of "serial monogamy."
The participants spoke into sensitive microphones and had their voices analysed with sophisticated electronic equipment. The pitch of the men's voices accounted for about 42% of the difference in number of children between fathers, the researchers found.
Although other studies have suggested that men are more attracted to women with high voices, the study found that the pitch of the women's voices did not predict how many children they would have.
vhemters: Here's an excerpt of the latest MoveOn activity...I mean, I didn't bring any offspring into the world, but I do agree with the idea that once we're on the planet we all deserve a good and proper life...that's why I'm a volunteer!
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Noah T. Winer, MoveOn.org Political Actionmoveon-help@list.moveon.org Date: Sep 24, 2007 1:26 PM
Subject: Republicans vs. our kids
In seven days, millions of low-income kids will lose their health insurance unless the funding is renewed.2
So far, Republican leaders and the president have fought Democratic attempts to renew funding but they're nervous about voting against such a popular measure.
The more people who know this deadline is coming, the more pressure Republicans will feel to support kids' health care.
Will you write a letter to the editor demanding that Republican leaders stop blocking kids' health care?
sparky is a baker and a maker of all sorts of things like onion rings and cheesy things sparky is a baker that's why he is a maker and a trainer of the baker that bakes bread good, i like this!
Frish's Response:
Once a baker named sparky fed up hearing malarky he stood on his head kneading special bread T'was pumperknickel darky!
Normally, I'd get really worried and upset about an article like this. But as imaginative as I am, I cannot make this stuff up!
Going house Egging Brought out my chalk, criss crossing Jesus Mis-spelt? How???
Vandals egg house of local atheist Daily Herald Staff Reports Published: 9/23/2007 3:00 AM
The home of a local outspoken atheist was vandalized overnight Friday, police said -- with eggs tossed at the house and cars, and crosses and religious words scrawled in chalk on the driveway.
A church bulletin also was stuck on the front door.
The incident comes days after Rob Sherman's daughter, Dawn, led a successful effort to have the song "God Bless America" yanked from Buffalo Grove High School's homecoming celebration. Dawn Sherman is a freshman on the student council.
The vandalism likely was the retaliatory work of youngsters, police Sgt. Mike Millett said -- since it came on the heels of the school incident and because one of the chalked words, "Jesus," was misspelled.
I can understand the church's concerns. Is a "blasphemous" image of Christ (or video, worse yet) to be ignored?
On the other hand, the idea of Christ...Man-God, Virgin Birth, Mithras coincidence, no historical record, rewrite and selection of liturgy in Nicea, walked on water...perhaps isn't something the church ought to be so defensive of in the first place!
Pot-bellied Jesus ad irks Church By Frances Harrison BBC religious affairs reporter
Catholic bishops in Belgium have protested against a TV ad depicting Jesus as a pot-bellied hippy picking up half-naked women in a nightclub.
The advertisement is being aired on the country's main TV channel to promote youth channel Plug TV.
The Catholic Church says this sort of portrayal of Jesus is disrespectful to believers and that it is wrong to use him for advertising.
However, Plug TV denies that the advertisement is blasphemous.
'Number one dad'
The ad shows a long-haired hippy Jesus grooving along as he tries to get into a nightclub and is refused entry by the bouncers.
Jesus makes the sign of the cross and sweeps aside the bouncers, shrinking them so they are left in his wake as dwarves.
This Plug TV version of Jesus then drinks whisky at the bar and magically turns two brown haired frumpy women into blonde babes wearing bikini tops and red horns.
The Jesus character then disappears into a huge limousine with the women but his attention is distracted by an advertisement for Plug TV before he is recalled by God who is standing on a cloud, wearing a T shirt with "Number one dad" written on it.
The God figure tells Jesus off for wanting to watch Plug TV as well as everything else - saying "you still want more".
The Catholic Church has expressed its disapproval to the TV channel - saying advertising is not the same as journalism and should not share the same concerns about freedom of expression. The Church believes this advertisement "crosses the limits of respectability".
Plug TV however argues it is not blasphemous but contains a message about a "laid-back Jesus addressing youth".
Oct 9, 2007 8:27 pm US/Eastern
Updated: 6:10 a.m. PT Oct 9, 2007 
