Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Sexual Economics 101 - Male monkeys pay for sex

While the idea of paying for sex is not new, this may be the first documentation in non-humans of a "cultural" practice that leads to sex as payment, since the "cost" of the plumage on a pheasant may be a different means for paying for sex...or the house a bird builds etc...(And, with the frequency of mating being only 1.5 times per hour what are those monkeys getting wrong???)
 

Wed Jan 2, 1:52 PM ET

PARIS (AFP) - Selling sex is said to be humankind's oldest profession but it may have deep evolutionary roots, according to a study into our primate cousins which found that male macaques pay for intercourse by using grooming as a currency.

Michael Gumert of Nanyang Technological University in Singapore made the discovery in a 20-month investigation into 50 long-tailed macaques in Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, New Scientist reports on Saturday.

On average, females had sex 1.5 times per hour.

But this rate jumped to 3.5 times per hour immediately after the female had been groomed by a male -- and her partner of choice was likely to be the hunky monkey that did the grooming.

Market forces also acted on the value of the transaction.

If there were several females in the area, the cost of buying sex would drop dramatically -- a male could "buy" a female for just eight minutes of nit-picking.

But if there were no females around, he would have to groom for up to 16 minutes before sex was offered.

The work supports the theory that biological market forces can explain social behaviour, the British weekly says.

"There is a very well-known mix of economic and mating markets in the human species itself," said Ronald Noe of France's University of Strasbourg.

"There are many examples of rich old men getting young attractive ladies."

So, did you see this yet?

Just a little something from Fearless Leader Frish, and Bright's Central...
 
(J.T.: please distribute and/or post in all the right places...)
 
 
That is the article in which I am quoted, along with others...regarding being Bright and still respecting aspects of religion.
 
As you can see below, "Bright" Paul doesn't like being second banana, but hey, the article also characterized my non-belief as "Atheistic Leanings"  (yeah, like HORIZONTAL!)...
 
We'll probably see other outlets pick up this article over the next few months, it is the way of the web these days...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Geisert <the-brights@the-brights.net>
Date: Jan 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: So, did you see this yet?
Frish
Thanks for forwarding the "heads up".  I did not know about it.  
Love the part about the Bright who is a Greek Orthodox deacon.
 
Nice little article (except for:  "Mynga Futrell, who started the organization in 2003 with the help of her husband, Paul Geisert…")

Hummmm.

Bright Regards

Paul

Paul Geisert

Mynga Futrell

cid:image001.png@01C84303.E1AB1E30 Co-Directors of www.The-Brights.Net

illuminating and elevating the naturalistic worldview